Sunday, October 21, 2012

Financial Times: Worsening Economic situation forces Iranian parliament to react


Financial Times
October 21,  2012
Najmeh Bozorgmehr

Iran’s parliament has revised its budget law in a bid to curb the populist policies of President Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad amid criticisms that these policies have made the country more vulnerable to sanctions.
MPs on Sunday approved an urgent plan “to support investment in development [projects] and national production and revise the budget law” after a week of discussion.

Under the revised law, the government is barred from using oil revenues or the difference between the official and open market currency exchange rates to pay for a widespread programme of welfare payments, and is threatened with prosecution if it violates the terms of the law.

Iran’s economy has been rocked by international sanctions imposed in response to its disputed nuclear programme. An EU ban on Iran’s oil imports, which came into force in July, and US banking sanctions have hit the currency market hard, leading to a more than 50 per cent fall in the rial since January.
Iran’s fundamentalists are in a tense power struggle with the president, who is barred by the constitution from running for a third term in elections next June but is believed to be seeking to have a close ally succeed him.

His critics argue that his lavish spending on public welfare payments has come at the expense of longer-term development projects and is the main reason behind a rapid rise in consumer prices and sharp drop in domestic production – curbing the economy’s ability to withstand sanctions.
According to official figures, inflation and youth unemployment stand at 23.5 per cent and 28.6 per cent respectively, but economists believe real the figures are far higher.
Ali Larijani, Iran’s parliament speaker, who is one of Mr Ahmadi-Nejad’s main opponents and may run for president, said last week that the legislative body had decided to focus on the economy to help support domestic industries.
This was necessary, due to “the sensitive conditions” resulting from sanctions, he said, while insisting that sanctions were not the main cause of the country’s economic woes. Instead, he blamed the government for the deteriorating economy, including the closure of half of the country’s industrial complexes due to financial problems.
At the heart of the attacks against the president is his decision to cut about $100bn in subsidies on energy and other basic commodities which began in December 2010 as a much-needed reform of the country’s state-dominated economy.
This plan has placed an increasingly heavy burden on the economy because the government decided to give almost all the money saved from the subsidy cuts – not half as was required by the law – back to the public in the form of cash compensation payments, in spite of the inflationary impact of such a move. Whereas half of the money saved was supposed to have been used to compensate producers for rising energy bills.
More than 60m Iranians, out of a population of 75m, are receiving IR455,000 ($37.11 at the official exchange rate) each month as compensation for the rise in prices of basic goods.
The government, which is believed to be facing a huge budget deficit, has also been accused by some MPs of trying to exploit sanctions by making money out of fluctuations in the currency markets.
The legislative body on Sunday also restricted government access to the National Development Fund, into which 20 per cent of oil revenues is placed for long-term development projects, amid speculation that the government was planning to use the fund to help meet its budget shortfall.
Other parts of the revised budget bill are intended to increase investment in upstream oil and gas projects and to stop the government from using the proceeds from the privatisation of state-owned companies for any purpose not specified in the budget law.
“If the subsidies plan were carried out properly and legally,” said Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani, a former president and chief critic of the current government “it could have helped boost the country’s economy and [domestic] production and deter foreign threats [sanctions].”
It is not clear yet how the government of Mr Ahmadi-Nejad -- which is occasionally accused of ignoring parliament approvals – will respond to the new budget restrictions. But analysts doubt there will be any cut in the welfare payments or change to the scheme – at least until the presidential election in June.



No comments:

Post a Comment